Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
3520 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +2129%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
576
256
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK104
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy