CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
VS
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 570M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+27424%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 570M
0.061 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
VS
Quadro FX 570M
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.800 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.600 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.80 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
G84
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
NB8P-GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
2
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
3
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla K10
4
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
5
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
6
NVIDIA L4 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
7
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
8
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500
9
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla M10
10
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla T10
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy