Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +552%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro M4000
2.573 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
1664
256
TMUs
104
128
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.47 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
80.39 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.573 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
80.39 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GM204
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GM204-850-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy