Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (2050MHz vs 1650MHz)
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
16.79 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 +40%
23.65 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2021
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
1050 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
640.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
4096
Shading Units
7168
256
TMUs
224
128
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
32
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
369.6 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.65 TFLOPS
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
369.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GA102
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net