Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 84% (2050MHz vs 1114MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 317.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+145%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000
6.844 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
988 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
3072
256
TMUs
192
128
ROPs
96
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GM200
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
8 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
