Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +20887%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
4096
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
G84
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy