Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (2050MHz vs 1620MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+406%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
May 2019
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
TU117
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
