Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
4032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +9439%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
4096
Shading Units
64
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
12
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
59W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
G94
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy