Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +1533%
16.79 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
448
256
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GF100
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
238W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy