Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1100 +4529%
22.22 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Dec 2010
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
7168
Shading Units
192
448
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
204 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
694.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
22.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
62W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
100 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy