Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
10240 additional rendering cores
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Lower TDP (350W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +374%
52.43 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2021
Data Center GPU
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
8192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
16384
Shading Units
6144
1024
TMUs
192
0
ROPs
96
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Board Design

2400W
TDP
350W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
10 nm
100 billion
Transistors
8 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy