Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

VS

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages

Released 2 years late

Boost Clock1600MHz

More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 1229GB/s)

8704 additional rendering cores

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages

Lower TDP (500W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +279%

52.43 TFLOPS

Arctic Sound 2T

13.82 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

VS

Arctic Sound 2T

Graphics Card

Jan 2023

Release Date

Jan 2021

Data Center GPU

Generation

Xe Graphics

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 5.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz

Base Clock

-

1600 MHz

Boost Clock

-

1565 MHz

Memory Clock

1200 MHz

Memory

128GB

Memory Size

16GB

HBM2e

Memory Type

HBM2e

8192bit

Memory Bus

4096bit

3205GB/s

Bandwidth

1229GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

16384

Shading Units

7680

1024

TMUs

240

0

ROPs

120

1024

Tensor Cores

-

128

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per EU)

L1 Cache

-

408 MB

L2 Cache

8 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s

Pixel Rate

108.0 GPixel/s

1638 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

216.0 GTexel/s

52.43 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

27.65 TFLOPS

52.43 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

13.82 TFLOPS

52.43 TFLOPS

FP64 (double)

3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio

GPU Name

Arctic Sound

-

GPU Variant

-

Generation 12.5

Architecture

Generation 12.5

Intel

Foundry

Intel

10 nm

Process Size

10 nm

100 billion

Transistors

8 billion

1280 mm²

Die Size

190 mm²

Board Design

2400W

TDP

500W

2800 W

Suggested PSU

900 W

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

1x 16-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

N/A

-

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

2

NVIDIA Tesla P4 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

3

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition

4

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

5

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

6

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

7

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

8

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

9

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q

10

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

Related News

1

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

2

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

3

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

4

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

5

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

6

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

7

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

8

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

9

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly

10

NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products