Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
16000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+7487%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Feb 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
16384
Shading Units
384
1024
TMUs
48
0
ROPs
32
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
2400W
TDP
100W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q5
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
100 billion
Transistors
3 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
