Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
16352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +65437%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
16384
Shading Units
32
1024
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

2400W
TDP
50W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy