Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

VS

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1600MHz vs 1545MHz)

More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)

14080 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages

Lower TDP (160W vs 2400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +636%

52.43 TFLOPS

Quadro RTX 4000

7.119 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

VS

Quadro RTX 4000

Graphics Card

Jan 2023

Release Date

Nov 2018

Data Center GPU

Generation

Quadro

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 5.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz

Base Clock

1005 MHz

1600 MHz

Boost Clock

1545 MHz

1565 MHz

Memory Clock

1625 MHz

Memory

128GB

Memory Size

8GB

HBM2e

Memory Type

GDDR6

8192bit

Memory Bus

256bit

3205GB/s

Bandwidth

416.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

36

-

Compute Units

-

16384

Shading Units

2304

1024

TMUs

144

0

ROPs

64

1024

Tensor Cores

288

128

RT Cores

36

64 KB (per EU)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

408 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s

Pixel Rate

98.88 GPixel/s

1638 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

222.5 GTexel/s

52.43 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

14.24 TFLOPS

52.43 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

7.119 TFLOPS

52.43 TFLOPS

FP64 (double)

222.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio

GPU Name

TU104

-

GPU Variant

TU104-850-A1

Generation 12.5

Architecture

Turing

Intel

Foundry

TSMC

10 nm

Process Size

12 nm

100 billion

Transistors

13.6 billion

1280 mm²

Die Size

545 mm²

Board Design

2400W

TDP

160W

2800 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

No outputs

Outputs

3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

1x 16-pin

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

2

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

3

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470

4

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition

5

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

6

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

7

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Tesla K8

8

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M

9

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

10

Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

Related News

1

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

2

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

3

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

4

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

5

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

6

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

7

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

8

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

9

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

10

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports