Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1600MHz vs 1260MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+180%
52.43 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Max Q
18.71 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Mar 2022
Data Center GPU
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
585 MHz
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
58
16384
Shading Units
7424
1024
TMUs
232
0
ROPs
96
1024
Tensor Cores
232
128
RT Cores
58
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
80W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GA103
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
100 billion
Transistors
22 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
