Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA A2

ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA A2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 73W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
A2 +3046%
4.531 TFLOPS
VS
A2

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2021
FireGL
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
120
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GA107
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
Unknown
153 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy