Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD FirePro D300

ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
FirePro D300 +1411%
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2014
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy