Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 +1972%
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2019
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
120
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
TU117
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy