Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock888MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand +1320%
2.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2013
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
823 MHz
-
Boost Clock
888 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1152
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.31 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.25 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.046 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.25 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GK104
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GK104-200-KD-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy