ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
T400
+659%
1.094 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2021
FireGL
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
120
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
TU117
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
