Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
5000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +15191%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2021
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Navi 21
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy