Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +22087%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2023
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Navi 32
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Navi 32
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy