Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250 +168%
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
120
Shading Units
128
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

73W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
G92B
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy