Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 345W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1677MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling +9441%
13.74 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2017
FireGL
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1406 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1677 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.3 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
429.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.48 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.74 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
858.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

73W
TDP
345W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Vega 10
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XTX
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy