ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
18056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada
+63136%
91.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Dec 2022
FireGL
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
120
Shading Units
18176
8
TMUs
568
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
AD102
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
