Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 89W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600 +92%
0.192 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireGL
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
3
Compute Units
-
120
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GF119
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

89W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy