Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (127W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +39%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
27
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
216
16
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GT200
R600 GL
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

127W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy