Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7700 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

ATI FireGL V7700 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V7700 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.06GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7700 +1453%
0.497 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Feb 2008
FireGL
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1126 MHz
Memory Clock
495 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
72.06GB/s
Bandwidth
7.920GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
2
320
Shading Units
40
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.592 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.592 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.84 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
RV610
RV670 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy