Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

ATI FireGL V7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V7700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.06GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7700 +1320%
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Oct 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1126 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
72.06GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GT216
RV670 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
31W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy