Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD FireStream 9370

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD FireStream 9370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370 +500%
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2010
FireGL
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1600
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Cypress
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy