Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +1201%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Apr 2017
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Ellesmere
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy