Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1880MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700 +1868%
8.663 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Nov 2019
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1880 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
120.3 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
270.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.33 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.663 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
541.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

159W
TDP
205W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Navi 10
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy