ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
+145%
1.078 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GF100
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
