ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
+260%
1.585 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.51 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.05 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.585 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
66.05 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
134W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GK106
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GK106-240-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
