Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
5824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +5975%
26.73 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Aug 2023
FireGL
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
160bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
320
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
AD104
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net