Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Nov 2018
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Polaris 30
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
R500
Architecture
GCN 4.0
UMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy