Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
R500
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy