Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA T400

ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 32W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
May 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy