Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

ATI FireMV 2250 vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)
ATI Radeon HD 4750 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Sep 2009
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
-
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.68 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
934.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
186.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
RV740
-
GPU Variant
RV740 PRO
R500
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.826 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
137 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy