Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

ATI FireMV 2260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 +1670%
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Dec 2008
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
40.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy