ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
-
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Rage 9
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
-
Shader Model
4.0
