Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD Radeon R9 390

ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD Radeon R9 390

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 390 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jun 2015
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
40
-
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
160.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
5.120 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
640.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV380
GPU Name
Grenada
-
GPU Variant
Grenada PRO (215-0880030)
Rage 9
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
-
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy