Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 635 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Oct 2013
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
203 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

64MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.736 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.94 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
742.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.94 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV380
GPU Name
GK208
-
GPU Variant
-
Rage 9
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
-
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy