Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon Pro V620 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
72
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
-
288
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
633.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
40.55 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
20.28 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
RV380
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
130 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
20W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy