Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jul 2008
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
203 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

64MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV380
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
Rage 9
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

9.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
-
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy