Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1019MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
May 2012
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
203 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

64MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
1536
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV380
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
Rage 9
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
-
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy