Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Aug 2015
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1024 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
203 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

64MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.496GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.02 GPixel/s
1.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.02 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
1.825 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV380
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-250-A1
Rage 9
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

9.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
-
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy