Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro W8000

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +9981%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Tahiti
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy