ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA P102 101
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 10GB VRAM P102 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
P102 101
+33306%
10.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2018
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1670 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
10GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
25
40
Shading Units
3200
4
TMUs
200
4
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.6 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
334.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
167.0 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.69 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
334.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GP102
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
GP102-101-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
